Blagos Believers (cartoon)

January 6th, 2009

Burris Denied Senate Seat (video) - The Clowns of Politics

January 6th, 2009

Skier Caught in Chairlift - Hangs Upside Down, Pantless, Until Rescued

January 6th, 2009

…”a skier at Colorado’s ritzy Vail resort was left dangling upside down and pantsless from a chairlift last Friday morning. The January 2 mishap apparently occurred after the male skier and a child boarded a high-speed lift in Vail’s Blue Sky Basin. It appears that the chairlift’s fold-down seat was somehow not in the lowered position, which caused the man to partially fall through the resulting gap. His right ski got jammed in the ascending chairlift, and that kept him upended since his boot never dislodged from its binding. ….The exposed skier was stuck for about 15 minutes before Vail personnel backed the lift up and successfully dislodged the unidentified man from the four-seat chair.” …

Teachers Barred from Marking Student Papers in Red - “Red Ink Did Me Good”!

January 6th, 2009

By Tom Purcell

My second-grade teacher would be at once shocked and proud.

Maybe I better explain.

According to Britain’s Daily Mail, yet another trend is under way in which we’re turning our kids into a bunch of softies. Many schools within the UK have barred teachers from marking student papers in red. This trend has also been documented in Australia and the United States.

As it goes, correcting pupils with red ink is considered too confrontational and unpleasant for the children. Many teachers prefer to grade in more soothing colors, such as green, blue, pink and yellow.

Red ink surely wasn’t banned at St. Germaine Catholic School in the ’60s and ’70s. That school was all business, and the wonderful sisters who taught there were too busy ramming knowledge and values into us to worry about our sensitive little egos.

It is true that the sisters were more favorable toward the better students. Who could blame them. We had 40 kids or more packed into each class. The sisters, many of whom entered the convent during the Depression years and were getting on in years by the 1970s, were exhausted. They had little patience with underachieving runts such as me.

Whereas the better students, usually girls, were always attentive and eager, I was always off daydreaming in another world. I couldn’t wait until recess. I couldn’t wait until we played keep-away, as I was good at that. I returned to class sweaty and rumpled and resumed daydreaming through the rest of the afternoon.

I was a continual disappointment to my second-grade teacher (we called her Sister Mary Brass Knuckles) and, boy, did she let me have it. When she called me out of my daydreaming world to approach the chalkboard and complete an equation, I was lost in left field without a glove.

Sister never let me off easy. She never let anybody off easy, because she saw it as her duty to ram math, science and grammar into our noggins.

She didn’t worry about our self-esteem or how good we felt. She knew the only way to attain self-esteem — the only way to function as an adult — was to be accurate and correct. She marked up my English compositions as though she were getting paid to use red ink.

Nobody knew it then, but she was way ahead of her time.

A recent study by the Brown Center on Education Policy at the Brookings Institution found that “a nation’s level of student ‘happiness’ and ‘confidence’ is negatively correlated to student achievement when compared to other nations.”

The study concluded the following: “That America’s infatuation with the ‘happiness factor’ in education may be misplaced, and could, in fact, be hurting, not helping, American students when it comes to maintaining an international competitive edge.”

In other words, America has some of the most smug and self-assured — and least accomplished — students on the face of the Earth. Since they were babies, caring adults and educators assured them they are intelligent, attractive and wonderful — even though nobody asked them to break a sweat earning their wonderfulness.

So it turns out the proponents of the anti-red-ink movement have it wrong. The good sisters at St. Germaine had it right. All those red marks on my second-grade composition papers were unpleasant at the time, but they did me good in the long run.

Sister would be at once shocked and proud to learn that this daydreaming pupil eventually woke up and went on to write a nationally syndicated newspaper column.

©2009 Tom Purcell. Tom is a humor columnist nationally syndicated exclusively by CagleCartoons newspaper syndicate.

Santa Left the Flu for Me

January 5th, 2009

Your humble scribe is “under the weather” thanks to that Chicago Santa.  We (Santa’s helper isn’t so hot either) will return to publishing The Doc Is In as soon as a medical miracle arrives!

Why the Israeli-Palestinian Flare Up? - An Interview

January 3rd, 2009

explosives02.gif   If anyone can explain the worst flare up of Israeli-Palestinian violence in the Gaza Strip in four decades, it’s Aaron David Miller. For 20 years, until he became a public policy fellow at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars in Washington in 2006, Miller was a top Middle East advisor to six secretaries of state (Shultz to Powell). His specialty was formulating U.S. policy on the Middle East and the Arab-Israeli peace process. A regular guest on network and cable TV, a writer of commentary pieces for top U.S. papers, his four books include “The Much Too Promised Land: America’s Elusive Search for Arab-Israeli Peace.” Bill Steigerwald talked to Miller on Tuesday, Dec. 30, as the death toll from Israeli air strikes inside Hamas-controlled Gaza approached 400 and Hamas was continuing to use long-range rockets to hit population centers in Israel.

Q: Can you briefly describe what the society and economy of the Gaza Strip are like?

A: It’s one of the most densely populated areas in the world. It’s primarily urban. Per capita income is extremely low, unemployment is extremely high. There’s no starvation, but over the last two years, particularly since Hamas rose to power, as a consequence of the international boycott — which the Israelis have tried to orchestrate because it is trying to pressure Hamas into changing its policies — economic activity, trade and aid to Gaza have suffered…. It’s a dysfunctional environment made even more dysfunctional by — at least when Fatah ran it — a corrupt and divided leadership and the Israeli occupation, even though Israel no longer occupies Gaza. They withdrew unilaterally in 2005. It’s a society under tremendous stress.

Q: Gaza is neither a free, sovereign state nor an occupied one — so what is it?

A: It’s not occupied any longer, although the occupation has not ended in the sense that the Israelis continue to control the borders, air space and access more or less by sea; the Egyptians control the southern access. But again, it’s a porous border. It’s not part of a state. It doesn’t have international sanction as a state. It’s part of the Palestinian Authority….

Q: Is Hamas the chief cause of the current escalation in violence?

A: You know, it’s an interesting question. I would argue that the cease-fire no longer continued to serve the interests of either side. The Israelis grew increasingly impatient by Hamas’ disregard for what they believed to be the informal rules and accommodation, particularly in terms of willful shelling of Israel’s southern communities, particularly since the cease-fire came to an end on Dec. 19th.

Hamas was growing increasingly frustrated by the boycott and the economic siege of Gaza, and probably concluded that since it is an organization whose reason for being is armed struggle — it’s very nature is to resist and oppose — that it was worth taking a chance on continuing to push and test the Israelis, to find out what their limits were. The Israelis, who are still living under the shadow of their disastrous performance in the 2006 Israeli-Lebanon war, were determined to make a point that Israel still is a military power and it needs to be respected both by its friends and enemies.

I think that’s how you might explain the intensity and ferocity of the Israeli assault. It’s an effort to destroy Hamas’ military infrastructure, to kill as many of its operatives as possible, to degrade its capacity to rocket northern Israel and to generally undermine its authority and to make clear to the Palestinian public — the 1.5 million Palestinians who live in Gaza — that in essence Hamas is the cause of the problems and their misfortunes.

Q: Can Israel break the will of Hamas and prevent the rocket attacks without invading or re-occupying Gaza?

A: Invasion won’t break Hamas’ will over time. Re-occupation would be a nightmare for Israel — hundreds of soldiers would be killed, as well as international opprobrium for their reaction. The Israelis are too smart to re-occupy.

Q: Some say the civilians in Gaza are being unfairly punished by Israel. Do you think that is true?

A: I do. I think it makes no sense to try to punish Hamas by making life unbearable or miserable for the million and a half Palestinians who live there. It’s without logic, this strategy, because it’s not going to topple Hamas. It may well be that an Israeli military incursion won’t do that. It’s simply going to breed and generate the kind of resentment, anger and hatred for the Israelis and by implication for the United States. It doesn’t make any sense. If I were king for a day, I’d be flooding Gaza with aid.

Q: What is the U.S. position on Gaza now and is it the correct position?

A: The U.S. position is that the Israelis have a legitimate reason to strike. There is no indication whatsoever or effort to constrain, restrain or stop the Israelis. I suspect if Barack Obama were president today and the Israelis had done this, that his reaction would be no different from the one we see right now — which is essentially “Get Hamas, just try to kill as few civilians as you can.”

Q: Does Israel know what it is doing?

A: I think in the short-term, the answer is “yes.” And I think it has learned a great deal from its mistakes in Lebanon. But there is always, as the CIA would describe it, “blowback” — the law of unintended consequences, if you will…. This could still go extremely badly for the Israelis, which is one reason I suspect they don’t want to go in on the ground — but I suspect they will.

Q: As opposed to going in on the ground, what should the Israelis do?

A: The problem with violence, insurgency and war in the Middle East, unless there is a political outcome, you wonder what the purpose of it is. It’s very difficult for me to see a political pathway out of this, which is why it’s going to be extremely difficult for Barack Obama, who will inherit this crisis in a little more than three weeks, to manage or diffuse it.

Bill Steigerwald is a columnist at the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review.

Israel and Hamas (cartoon)

January 3rd, 2009

Facebook Conflict - Breast Feeding is NOT Obscene, Pornographic or Sexually Explicit

January 3rd, 2009

angry-smiley-034.gif   “Facebook is standing firm on a policy that has led to the removal of some photos posted by women that show breastfeeding.

The deletions have spurred Facebook members to stage protests both online and offline. Dozens of supporters gathered last Saturday at Facebook headquarters in Palo Alto, Calif., while online, more than 11,000 members participated in a virtual “nurse-in,” or changed their profile photos to images depicting women breastfeeding.

The controversy began after several women began noticing photographs of themselves nursing their children that were flagged for removal. They formed a group called “Hey Facebook, Breastfeeding is Not Obscene!” to protest a policy that prohibits members from uploading any content deemed to be “obscene, pornographic or sexually explicit,” which can include images showing exposed breasts.

Stephanie Knapp Muir, 40, one of the organizers of the Facebook group, said the company’s policy was unfair and discriminatory towards women. “If they were removing all photos of any exposed chest — male or female — in any context, at least that would be fair,” Ms. Muir said. “But they’re targeting women with these rules. They’ve deemed women’s breasts obscene and dangerous for children and it’s preposterous.” …

Star Racer - Dancia - Fined for Speeding!

January 3rd, 2009

Driver Danica Patrick paid a $196 fine.   “High-profile driver Danica Patrick paid a $196 fine to settle a speeding ticket after she was caught going 54 mph in a 35 mph zone last month in Scottsdale, Ariz.

Patrick, who in April became the first woman to win an IRL IndyCar Series race, was due in traffic court next week but paid the fine Wednesday, a Scottsdale City Court clerk said.

Patrick, 26, was pulled over by Scottsdale police Dec. 9 in her hometown while driving a 2007 Mercedes. A year ago, she was ticketed for driving 57 mph in a 40 mph zone in Scottsdale and was ordered to attend traffic school.

Scottsdale court records show the recent tickets are among several she has received in the past three years.”….

New, Zero-Calorie Sweetner - Stevia - FDA Approved

January 3rd, 2009

coca_cola.gif   The Food and Drug Administration in December cleared the way for Coca-Cola and Pepsi to use a new zero-calorie sweetener. Both Pepsi’s PureVia and Coke’s Truvia use rebiana, an extract from the stevia plant.

NutraSweet President Bill DeFer said the stevia products aren’t direct competition for its existing sweeteners. The company is working on its own product, he said, which is currently referred to as NutraSweet Natural with Stevia.

“Stevia is a genus of about 240 species of herbs and shrubs in the sunflower family (Asteraceae), native to subtropical and tropical South America and Central America. The species Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni, commonly known as sweetleaf, sweet leaf, sugarleaf, or simply stevia, is widely grown for its sweet leaves. As a sugar substitute, stevia’s taste has a slower onset and longer duration than that of sugar, although some of its extracts may have a bitter or licorice-like aftertaste at high concentrations.

With its extracts having up to 300 times the sweetness of sugar, stevia has garnered attention with the rise in demand for low-carbohydrate, low-sugar food alternatives. Medical research has also shown possible benefits of stevia in treating obesity and high blood pressure. Because stevia has a negligible effect on blood glucose, it is an attractive as a natural sweetener to people on carbohydrate-controlled diets. However, health and political controversies have limited stevia’s availability in many countries; for example, the United States banned it in the early 1990s unless labeled as a supplement, but reversed this decision in 2008 with the announcement of Truvia brand sweetener. Stevia is widely used as a sweetener in Japan, and it is now available in Canada as a dietary supplement.” ….